Man on Earth
- Theosophy and the Fossil Record,
by George McNamara
2. The Differences between
Men and Apes
The Secret Doctrine also points out the
following major ideas and differences
-
Physical man, we say, existed before
the first bed of the Cretaceous rocks was deposited.
In the early part of the Tertiary Age, the most brilliant
civilization the world has ever known flourished at
a period when the Hæckelian man-ape is conceived
to have roamed through the primeval forests, and Mr.
Grant Allen's putative ancestor to have swung himself
from bough to bough with his hairy mates, the degenerated
Liliths of the Third Race Adam. Yet there were no anthropoid
apes in the brighter days of the civilization of the
Fourth Race; but Karma is a mysterious law, and no respecter
of persons. The monsters bred in sin and shame by the
Atlantean giants, "blurred copies" of their
bestial sires, and hence of modern man (SD p.670)
-
. . . . . . . the size of the human
skull and its brain, as well as the cavities, increase
with the individual development of man. His intellect
develops and increases with age, while his facial bones
and jaws diminish and straighten, thus being more and
more spiritualized: whereas with the ape it is the reverse.
In its youth the anthropoid is far more intelligent
and good-natured, while with age it becomes duller;
and, as its skull recedes and seems to diminish as it
grows, its facial bones and jaws develop, the brain
being finally crushed, and thrown entirely back, to
make with every day more room for the animal type. The
organ of thought-the brain-recedes and diminishes, entirely
conquered and replaced by that of the wild beast-the
jaw apparatus. (SD p.682)
-
Elsewhere, though I cannot find the
quote, I have read that if you interbred congenital
idiots for several generations, you would get simian
or ape-like offspring, but you could selectively breed
the apes for centuries or millennia, but you would never
get a man.
-
flints of undeniably human making were
excavated from Miocene strata. (by l'abbé Bourgeois)
(SD p.675
-
When one finds that not only was the
"primeval savage" (?) a reality in the Miocene
times, but that, as de Mortillet shows, the flint relics
he has left behind him were splintered by fire in that
remote epoch; (SD p.678)
-
The difficulty is this: the difference
in structure between the lowest existing race of man
and the highest existing ape is too great to admit of
the possibility of one being the direct descendant of
the other. (SD p.677)
-
Still he is essentially a man, and separated
by a wide gulf from the chimpanzee or the gorilla. Even
the idiot or cretin, whose brain is no larger and intelligence
no greater than that of the chimpanzee, is an arrested
man, not an ape (SD p.678)
-
. . . . . . Lemuria, which was
the cradle of mankind-of the physical sexual creature
who materialized through long æons out of the
ethereal hermaphrodites. (SD p.680)
The next page is Other
Aspects of Evolution
More from the SD on this topic is given in
Appendix3 - Evidence and discussion
of man and the Apes
|